Ĭurrently, ablation is a very effective treatment for atrial fibrillation however, the prevailing view is that ablation does not reduce the incidence of stroke and deaths. In particular, strokes carries prognostic implications in terms of mortality and ongoing morbidity. Stroke events due to AF cause a heavy financial and emotional burden on patients, as well as on society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.ĭata Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.įunding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.Ĭompeting interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.Ītrial fibrillation (AF), the most common persistent arrhythmia in clinical practice, has been called the "cardiovascular epidemic of the 21st century" and is increasing in prevalence worldwide. Received: OctoAccepted: JanuPublished: January 19, 2022Ĭopyright: © 2022 Song et al. PLoS ONE 17(1):Įditor: Tariq Jamal Siddiqi, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, UNITED STATES Citation: Song J, Zhang Q, Ye L, Zheng Y, Wang L (2022) The comparison of catheter ablation on hard outcomes versus medical treatment for atrial fibrillation patients: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |